@article{TGH10535,
author = {Hannah Darnell and Sara Bidarian and Joel Richter and Bahaaeldeen Ismail},
title = {Assessing variability in predictors of adequate follow-up after esophageal food bolus impaction: a retrospective study and literature review},
journal = {Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology},
volume = {11},
number = {0},
year = {2026},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Background: Despite guidelines recommending comprehensive post-esophageal food bolus impaction (EFBI) evaluation, follow-up adherence varies. It’s unclear whether predictors of follow-up are consistent or unique to individual populations. We assess post EFBI follow-up rates and predictors at our center and compare them to existing literature.Methods: We retrospectively studied adults (≥18 years) presenting with EFBI between June 2021 and October 2024. Patients without follow-up data or with non-food bolus impactions were excluded. Patients were categorized by follow-up adequacy (endoscopy or office visit within six months). We compared demographic, clinical, and endoscopic variables. Predictors of follow-up were identified using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. We also reviewed comparable studies to evaluate differences in patient populations, study designs, and factors influencing follow-up rates.Results: Among 137 patients, 60 (44%) lacked adequate follow-up. On multivariable analysis, predictors of follow-up included Caucasian race [odds ratio (OR) 24.4, P},
issn = {2415-1289}, url = {https://tgh.amegroups.org/article/view/10535}
}